Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@aredridel@kolektiva.social
2024-03-26 04:42:43

I've been reading "On Green” (joecarlsmith.com/2024/03/21/on) and its following article, “On Attunement” with some interest today. I am uninterested in the ways he is focused on “AGI”, but that might actually be part of what he's saying and missing.
They talk about the philosophy of green in the "magic the gathering" sense, which has five core modes of things, and being a game, designed to balance. It's an attractive system and not without merit as a philosophical labeling system. In short: white, moral; blue, knowledge and rationality; red, passion and desire; black, power and achievement. And green. Green is the subject they can't identify clearly.
I don't think they really understand green. (They come from a very rationalist place, and that's not a good mode to understand Green)
Green is the domain of systems thinking and of ecology. It's one of flexible boundaries and hierarchies that vanish when you look at them for long. They talk about philosophical agents and try to fit a green philosophical stance into that framework, but it misses: the very idea of a self is nebulous in a green philosophy. Yes, it obviously exists, we are all separate from each other. But also we are inseparable from each other. Green is a philosophy of relationality and multiple perspectives and ever shifting viewpoints. It's not just yin, passive, permissive, but holistic. It's not that it lets the Other in, it's that it actively is in relation with the Other. The other is the self, the self is the other.
The essays also label green as conservative, and this is not quite true. It is not about being slow or regressive or traditional, but about being whole. They can't quite see that green's willingness to accept death and pain as things that happen and also its strong preservationist stance are not opposed to each other. It seems incoherent, but it's not: death and pain are things that happen to living parts of an ecosystem. They matter, but so too does the whole matter. Where so many blue rationalists see statistical and demographic counts of deaths and "sentient beings harmed”, green sees a whole ecosystem where some of that is deeply natural. It's unnatural, ecosystem-harming deaths that are disasters in the green philosophy. Wholesale extinctions. Protracted, painful deaths, as much for the wound they cause outside the individual as the individual suffering as well. But we all come to an end, and to change that wholesale would end so many kinds of relationship, so many things.
Green revels in the illegible, the incomplete, and the connected. It's easy to be green-blind, to ignore the subtle systemic effects. So many of us want simple cause and effect, rather than action and plurality of reactions.
Green's ability to embrace the illegible lets it deal with Red chaos; its resilience tempers red passion. It can ally with White philosophies into a pastoral, conservative, moralistic framework. It ends up at odds with the rationalist Blue and the power-hungry Black, because they drive disequilibrium, but more than just transition to new stable ecologies, they drive systems permanently out of stability, destroying relationships in their path. When confronted with this, they will deny it because the objects are still there. Preserved. Catalogued. Legible and accounted for. Perhaps used instrumentally. Perhaps wrecked for some "greater purpose” but only acknowledged as objects. The relationships between things remain illegible.

@jgkoomey@mastodon.energy
2024-04-21 16:15:07

The idea that a professional society is taking away a doctor’s right to practice medicine based on that doctor’s political speech criticizing powerful corporate interests is really dark. This is how fascism happens, folks. And guess what? A doctor fighting polluting industries IS doing the right thing for public health, so such speech should be celebrated! The sooner we phase out fossil fuels, the better.

@mgorny@social.treehouse.systems
2024-04-12 18:21:13

ASD, emotional memory, fears
Emotional memory is a bitch, and people in the spectrum are particularly vulnerable to it.
Let's say that something triggers the emotion of fear in you. You may be consciously recalling some bad memories, you may be imagining a possible outcome. However, when emotional memory comes into action, things are much worse. Your nervous system immediately brings the deep feeling of fear that is associated with the memory. You may even no longer be able to recall the memory, forget it entirely, yet your mind will ceaselessly keep hitting you with a whole set of emotions that you can't control, every single time it happens.
What's even worse, these things add up. Bad memories create fear. Fear creates more bad memories. These memories amplify the emotional reaction — and the wheel turns.
But the worst is the lack of understanding. People telling you that you are being irrational, that you are being an embarrassment to your family, that they have to give stuff up because of you. So the emotional memory becomes richer with the feelings of embarrassment, guilt and low self-esteem. All coalescing into a huge ball of emotion.
Today, you know it's not true. The fear wasn't irrational at all, it's pretty understandable in people who are #ActuallyAutistic, even "typical". Yet, what's the point of knowing that, if these emotions are deeply seated in your memory, and they will haunt you forever, and prevent you from ever having an illusion of normal life?

@zimpenfish@social.rjp.is
2024-01-29 10:36:43

15 minutes into "Lift" and I've already drowned ten times in exposition.

It's another of those films that relies on "the good guys" being wilfully incompetent because there's no earthly way the incompetent bad guys would be able to pull off their hideously dumb schemes. Also "using popular music as emotional trigger".

Like they use a fire boat to stop a chase except even in Venice the fire crew aren't sitting there in a boat with …

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-04-09 08:58:12

This arxiv.org/abs/2302.05563 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-04-01 07:07:00

Reflectionless propagation of beams through a stratified medium
Sounak Sinha Biswas, Ghanasyam Remesh, Venu Gopal Achanta, Ayan Banerjee, Nirmalya Ghosh, Subhasish Dutta Gupta
arxiv.org/abs/2403.20129

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-04-01 07:07:00

Reflectionless propagation of beams through a stratified medium
Sounak Sinha Biswas, Ghanasyam Remesh, Venu Gopal Achanta, Ayan Banerjee, Nirmalya Ghosh, Subhasish Dutta Gupta
arxiv.org/abs/2403.20129